RUN 1084 • RECENT MODEL RESULTS FROM SYSTEMATIC BREAKOUT SIGNALS

A rules-based breakout strategy that returned +493.88% portfolio — with disciplined risk control.

From 01/01/2022 to 06/05/2026, a $15,000 test portfolio following the same rules-based breakout engine behind our daily alerts delivered +493.88% total return versus +54.36% for SPY, with a -24.83% max drawdown. This page reflects Run 1084, the most recent TEA model test.

★

+493.88% total return versus +54.36% for SPY over the same window.
✓

49.90% annualized return across more than four years of changing market conditions.
✓

634 completed trades, 48.11% win rate, 1.86 profit factor, and 2.295% expectancy per trade.
✓

Risk-managed breakout investing using market regime analysis, exposure controls, position sizing, and systematic exits.
✓

✓ Performance updated June 2026 (Run 1084)

Get These Signals View trade-by-trade proof See Performance Details

Run 1084 – Recent Model Results

Run Window

01/01/2022 - 06/05/2026

Start Cash

$15,000

End Equity

$89,082

Total Return

+493.88%

Annualized Return

49.90%

Max Drawdown

-24.83%

SPY Return

+54.36%

SPY Annualized

10.37%

SPY Max Drawdown

-25.36%

Trades

634 total

Wins / Losses

305 / 329

Win Rate

48.11%

Average Win

10.47%

Average Loss

-5.28%

Profit Factor

1.86

Expectancy

2.295%

Average Hold

14.0 days

Max Hold

50 days

Sharpe / Sortino

1.43 / 1.92

Run 1084 reflects the most recent TEA model test from 01/01/2022 through 06/05/2026. Results are historical backtest results and are not a guarantee of future performance.

Performance Highlights – Run 1084

What TEA’s Breakout Engine Delivered in the Most Recent Model Test

Run 1084 covers 01/01/2022 through 06/05/2026 and compares the TEA systematic breakout model against SPY over the same period. The model produced higher total return, higher annualized return, and a similar max drawdown profile while remaining rules-based and repeatable.

Total return

01 • Model vs SPY

+493.88% vs +54.36%

Run 1084 produced a +493.88% total return compared with +54.36% for SPY over the same period. The test started with $15,000 and ended at $89,082.

Same window: 01/01/2022 through 06/05/2026.

Annualized performance

02 • Compounding

49.90% Annualized Return

The model generated a 49.90% annualized return versus 10.37% annualized for SPY. This is the core TEA thesis: systematic entries, systematic exits, and disciplined compounding.

The goal is not one lucky trade. The goal is repeatable process.

Risk control

03 • Drawdown

-24.83% Max Drawdown

TEA’s max drawdown was -24.83% compared with -25.36% for SPY. The model was designed to participate in major uptrends while using exposure controls, position sizing, and sell discipline during difficult markets.

Risk management is part of the engine, not an afterthought.

Trade base

04 • Trade Count

634 Completed Trades

Run 1084 included 634 trades, with 305 wins and 329 losses. The win rate was 48.11%, showing that TEA does not need to win every trade to compound capital.

A positive expectancy system can work even with many small losses.

Expectancy

05 • Trade Math

Profit Factor 1.86

The average winning trade was +10.47%, while the average losing trade was -5.28%. That produced a 1.86 profit factor and 2.295% expectancy per trade.

The edge comes from asymmetric wins and controlled losses.

Process integrity

06 • Same Engine

Rules-Based, Repeatable, Transparent

Run 1084 reflects TEA’s systematic breakout process: market regime checks, stock selection, exposure control, position sizing, and rules-based exits. The model is built to produce daily actionable trade plans without emotional decision-making.

Historical results are educational and not a guarantee of future performance.

Stage Trade Order

🧠 Smart Stats

A rules-based breakout strategy that returned +493.88% portfolio — with disciplined risk control.

What TEA’s Breakout Engine Delivered in the Most Recent Model Test